Share with your friends










Submit

Analytics Magazine

Calling the smart way

Big data analytics increase call center productivity and reduce unwanted phone calls.

Douglas A. Samuelson and Olcay YucekayaBy Douglas A. Samuelson and Olcay Yucekaya

If we know anything about outbound telephone call centers, it’s these two facts: 1) People profess to hate all the unwanted telephone calls, and 2) Call centers keep making the calls because many of them actually do produce sales, debt payments and votes in elections. Now new research and development has produced a better approach, increasing response while decreasing the number of calls.

This seemingly paradoxical improvement reflects a profound insight: Most call centers have focused on increasing the number of dialing attempts, while trying to limit calling when no representative will be available to talk to the answering party. In fact, doing this much more effectively revolutionized the call center industry back in the late 1980s. The method resulted in a major patent [1] and a Wagner Prize finalist entry [2], as well as great success for the company that developed it.

Recently, 2Contact, a call and contact center company in Haarlem, the Netherlands, realized that a different focus would work better – not more calls, but calls better timed to reach the right party when the person is most amenable to being approached. This means that the software, trade named Smart-Call ™, uses big data and current high-speed computing capabilities to schedule call attempts, based on past responses by the called person or similar people. Neither the data nor the high-speed computations were available in the 1980s, but that was then, and this is now.

Ironically, this was initially a tough sale within 2Contact. Olcay Yucekaya, the inventor of Smart-Call, says, “It may sound hard to believe, but I’ve had more failures and rejections than you can imagine. In the end, ignoring the rejections and always thinking in solutions resulted in the fact that we are the leading call center in this idea.”

In fact, many U.S. companies have tried and are trying to integrate better data about called parties into their dialing systems. Since most of these approaches are closely guarded trade secrets, companies that claim to do superior list management are reluctant to disclose few if any substantiating data. We surmise, however, that these newer methods still rely on a predictive dialing method like the 1986 original, possibly modified to take advantage of cloud computing and real-time massively parallel simulations [3]. Such systems can adapt more quickly and smoothly to changing conditions (there’s no steady state in outbound calling, so traditional queuing models don’t help – it’s an adaptive automatic control problem, and rapid smooth adaptation is critical), but they still lack the shift in focus of Smart-Call.

Better-timed calls reach the right party when the person is most amenable to being approached

Better-timed calls reach the right party when the person is most amenable to being approached.

In tests using closely matched pairs of lists, 2Contact has observed that the list using the new method had a substantially higher rate of sales – 31 percent more, in the most rigorous test tried. The test group had a 4 percent higher answer rate – that is, somewhat more people were willing simply to answer the phone and talk to the representative if they were called at a more convenient time. But the difference in sales was much larger, indicating that the effect of time of call was much more than just whether people would answer.

Another performance statistic is the proportion of records in a contact list eventually used in the campaign. Most campaigns have a preset limit of number of times a party will be called. If this number of calls does not result in a conversation, the record is just abandoned for the purpose of a particular campaign. Usage rates around 60 percent to 70 percent are common; with a well-targeted campaign using older methods, it is unusually good if as many as 75 percent of the records end up being used. In the matched groups test, the “standard” group has 69 percent usage – but the test group had 93 percent.

And what about unwanted calls? The new method substantially reduces the number of call attempts per hour per representative, and even the number of completed calls per hour per representative. In the matched groups test, the test group averaged 4.31 completed calls per representative per hour, versus 5.54 for the other group; but the test group had 3.54 effective calls per hour, that is, calls that result in either a buying decision or a no-buy decision, versus 3.34 for the other group. (Completed calls also include connections to people who do not stay on the phone long enough to have the intended conversation, plus call sequences that reach the set limit on number of call attempts.)

Not surprisingly, the representatives in the test group had longer talk times, averaging three minutes and 19 seconds as compared with two minutes and 59 seconds for the other group. Conversations with the right party, when the person is receptive, do tend to last longer.

Also quite noteworthy is the abandoned call rate, the proportion of call attempts that result in the system hanging up on the called party because the dialing went too fast and there was no representative available to talk when the called party answered. The new method cut this rate almost in half, from 1.9 percent of attempts for the other group to 1.0 percent for the test group. The higher proportions of answers and long connects with the new targeting approach makes the system more stable and enables less “aggressive” dialing to keep representatives busy. The test group had an average of 24.38 dialing attempts per representative per hour, versus 30.85 for the other group. In short, Smart-Call reduces the call center’s costs and the number of unwanted calls it generates.

Of greatest interest to the call center and its clients, of course, is the sales rate. In the matched groups test, the test group had 0.24 sales per representative per hour, versus 0.18 for the other group. This is about a one-third increase, which clients can easily be persuaded to find admirable.

In summary, Smart-Call breaks the traditional focus on dialer performance. Instead, it concentrates, rightly, on improving the called parties’ experience, taking into account their demonstrated preferences about when they would prefer to be called. In fact, we are not at all convinced that the dialing system 2Contact used is all that good – but the tests and campaign experience using Smart-Call seem to indicate that the performance of the dialing system doesn’t matter all that much. Getting the timing right is much more important. (It should be noted that the numbers reported here have not been independently verified.)

If the success of this approach means that eventually more call centers will be calling you, and if that bothers you, we sympathize. As we said at the beginning, the call and contact centers industry continues to thrive, although perhaps not growing as fast as it did earlier, because, despite all the complaints, these calls do work. On the other hand, if contact centers use this new technology, they seem quite likely to bother you less than they do now, even while making more calls. They can achieve this by nearly eliminating nuisance calls in which you answer and they hang up because they have no one to talk to you, and by recognizing when you’re more likely to be receptive. At least they will know not to keep calling you at dinnertime.

Douglas A. Samuelson (samuelsondoug@yahoo.com), D.Sc. in operations research, is president and chief scientist of InfoLogix, Inc., a small R&D and consulting company in Annandale, Va. He is a contributing editor of OR/MS Today and Analytics magazines and a longtime member of INFORMS.

Olcay Yucekaya (oyucekaya@2contact.com) is a data scientist at 2Contact who also works with major companies outside the scope of 2Contact. He holds a master’s degree in marketing management from Tilburg University in Tilburg, the Netherlands. He gratefully acknowledges the assistance of Professor George Knox at Tilburg University in developing Smart-Call.

References

  1. Douglas A. Samuelson, “System for Regulating Arrivals of Customers to Servers,” U. S. Patent No. 4,858,120, Aug. 15, 1989.
  2. Douglas A. Samuelson, “Predictive Dialing for Outbound Telephone Call Centers,” Interfaces, September-October 1999.
  3. Michael Kaiser-Nyman, D. Samuelson and B. Swieskowski, “Predictive Dialing System Using Simulation,” U.S. Patent No. 9,088,650, July 21, 2015.

Analytics data science news articles

Related Posts

  • 38
    Most companies have massive databases of historical sales data, but few firms invest the money and staff time to mine the intelligence hidden in those databases. It seems that everyone has sales data, but almost no one does a good job of analyzing that data. The purpose of this article…
    Tags: sales, data
  • 37
    It’s long been popular to talk about customer interaction data such as clickstream, social activity, inbound email and call center verbatims as “unstructured data.” Wikipedia says of the term that it “…refers to information that either does not have a pre-defined data model or is not organized in a pre-defined…
    Tags: data
  • 36
    With the rise of big data – and the processes and tools related to utilizing and managing large data sets – organizations are recognizing the value of data as a critical business asset to identify trends, patterns and preferences to drive improved customer experiences and competitive advantage. The problem is,…
    Tags: data
  • 35
    Many organizations have noticed that the data they own and how they use it can make them different than others to innovate, to compete better and to stay in business. That’s why organizations try to collect and process as much data as possible, transform it into meaningful information with data-driven…
    Tags: data
  • 32
    I have, like many others, been caught up in the Hamilton craze. Duels are a central feature of the Broadway show, with three prominently featured, two of which were fatal. Since neither I nor Analytics editor Peter Horner have been able to procure tickets via the normal means, we will…
    Tags: number, percent, data


Headlines

Fighting terrorists online: Identifying extremists before they post content

New research has found a way to identify extremists, such as those associated with the terrorist group ISIS, by monitoring their social media accounts, and can identify them even before they post threatening content. The research, “Finding Extremists in Online Social Networks,” which was recently published in the INFORMS journal Operations Research, was conducted by Tauhid Zaman of the MIT, Lt. Col. Christopher E. Marks of the U.S. Army and Jytte Klausen of Brandeis University. Read more →

Syrian conflict yields model for attrition dynamics in multilateral war

Based on their study of the Syrian Civil War that’s been raging since 2011, three researchers created a predictive model for multilateral war called the Lanchester multiduel. Unless there is a player so strong it can guarantee a win regardless of what others do, the likely outcome of multilateral war is a gradual stalemate that culminates in the mutual annihilation of all players, according to the model. Read more →

SAS, Samford University team up to generate sports analytics talent

Sports teams try to squeeze out every last bit of talent to gain a competitive advantage on the field. That’s also true in college athletic departments and professional team offices, where entire departments devoted to analyzing data hunt for sports analytics experts that can give them an edge in a game, in the stands and beyond. To create this talent, analytics company SAS will collaborate with the Samford University Center for Sports Analytics to support teaching, learning and research in all areas where analytics affects sports, including fan engagement, sponsorship, player tracking, sports medicine, sports media and operations. Read more →

UPCOMING ANALYTICS EVENTS

INFORMS-SPONSORED EVENTS

INFORMS Annual Meeting
Nov. 4-7, 2018, Phoenix

Winter Simulation Conference
Dec. 9-12, 2018, Gothenburg, Sweden

OTHER EVENTS

Making Data Science Pay
Oct. 29 -30, 12 p.m.-5 p.m.


Applied AI & Machine Learning | Comprehensive
Starts Oct. 29, 2018 (live online)


The Analytics Clinic
Citizen Data Scientists | Why Not DIY AI?
Nov. 8, 2018, 11 a.m. – 12:30 p.m.


Advancing the Analytics-Driven Organization
Jan. 28–31, 2019, 1 p.m.– 5 p.m. (live online)


CAP® EXAM SCHEDULE

CAP® Exam computer-based testing sites are available in 700 locations worldwide. Take the exam close to home and on your schedule:


 
For more information, go to 
https://www.certifiedanalytics.org.