If it’s March, it must be time for March Madness, the annual college basketball lollapalooza that compels untold millions of people across the country to try and predict the outcome of a 64-team tournament (not including play-in games) in hopes of winning the office or online pool and all the glory and money that goes with it. The beauty (and perhaps irony) of March Madness is that no one – not the college basketball junkie, not the office nerd, not even the analytics guru well-versed in predictive analytics who studies “bracketology” (all three may be the same person) – knows the outcome in advance, so anyone has an equal chance of winning . . . or do they?
The gender pay gap among predictive analytics professionals is practically nonexistent, and the percentage of U.S. citizens in the profession at the junior level is increasing while the percentage of foreign-born professionals at the same level is decreasing as more U.S. students are entering the market. Those are two of the more notable trends in a new Burtch Works salary survey of predictive analytics professionals (PAPs). Read more →